Dataset·July 9, 2026·2 min read

What professional blending work looks like, step by step: 294 annotated bench trajectories

An open dataset of 294 annotated steps across 14 blending-bench trajectories, recorded as professional tasters built real red blends and single-vineyard lots at the bench and in the barrel cellar.

What does professional blending work actually look like, step by step? This sample dataset holds 294 annotated steps across 14 blending-bench trajectories, recorded as working tasters built real red blends and single-vineyard lots at the bench and in the barrel cellar.

We gave five tasters from the Oenra network a single cellar brief each, a new-release red blend, and recorded them carrying it through to multiple bottling-ready deliverables: a bench blend, a barrel selection, a press-fraction trial, a final assembly. The tasters narrated their reasoning aloud as they worked, so every step's thought is transcribed from the expert's own voice.

Each step pairs a photograph with a first-person thought, a structured action, and reproducible grounding: a component poured, a blend ratio set, a descriptor called, or a score logged, with a preferred execution path marking the most deterministic option. The format follows the AgentNet trajectory schema, extended with a blending action taxonomy and multi-path execution. This structure makes the data directly usable in several contexts:

  • Palate preference modeling: long-horizon, multi-cellar trajectories with photographs, actions, and blend ratios in a format interoperable with existing sensory-panel tooling.
  • Taster calibration: pair photographs with narration-grounded reasoning to capture how experts actually plan, taste, and correct course mid-assembly.
  • Sensory scoring systems: every step carries a structured action, so a bench can reach the same blend through a shared rubric instead of loose prose.
  • Benchmarking and evals: a human expert baseline for long-horizon cellar work, reproducible end-to-end at the bench.

The dataset was recorded in 2026 at the blending bench and in the barrel cellar. It is released under the CC BY 4.0 license on Hugging Face.

Continue reading3 studies
All research
  1. July 30, 2026Battle
    Cellier Orme 5 nails the nose and the mid-palate. The finish is what holds it back.Across 600 blind comparisons and 400 write ups, tasters liked the nose rather more than the rest of the glass. Acidity, length and a few tainted corks were what held it back.Read
  2. July 24, 2026Profile
    Five tasters, five flights: Sablette Blanc proves its strength on the nose.Five expert sparkling tasters ran five Sablette flights each on the same house cuvée. The first pours delivered clean fruit and a fine, even bead in minutes; five rounds of refinement never raised the depth.Read
  3. July 23, 2026Battle
    Karst K3 is a real rival to Bertaud 5.6 Sol on sparklingKarst K3 arrived ranked first on the Tasting Arena's sparkling board. Across 480 blind comparisons by 8 tasters, it finished level with Bertaud 5.6 Sol overall, and edged ahead on the older library vintages.Read